[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: About :: Main :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 32 (11-2020) ::
mieaoi 2020, 9(32): 53-77 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Informal Institutions on Economic Development
Zahra Kheiridoost Langaroodi 1, Farshad Momeni2 , Amir KhademAlizadeh3
1- PhD Student in Economics, Allameh Tabatabai University (Corresponding Author)
2- Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabatabai University
3- Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Allameh Tabatabai University
Abstract:   (3329 Views)
Comprehensive and realistic analysis of economic phenomena requires considering the complexities of human behavior and human society. In this context, a better understanding of economic development requires understanding of social and cultural evolution and its complex and mutual effects on economic developments. In this article, two Neoclassical and New Institutional schools were compared in terms of the relation between culture and economics with a comparative approach. The question is: what is the relationship between culture and economics and how this relationship helps to understand economic and cultural developments. In general, the neoclassical school has removed the normative part of the economy in its agenda. Although DJong(2000) tried to introduce culture as a source for preferences or limitations in the Neoclassical model, and limit institutional model to limitations, these view is rejected here. Some methodological problems, such as the assumption of exogenous preferences and complete rationality are recognized. Also in this paper we extract new institutionalists viewpoint on culture and economics, and first separate studies at the micro and development level, secondly provide a model from Douglas North's views on culture, Third, observe a unified approach among the new institutionalists, despite the differences, and ultimately express the strengths of the new institutional school in solving neoclassical model problems and better understanding economic developments. This paper also compares two views. The most important difference is that culture in neoclassical economics is an endogenous factor, but in institutional economics it comes to analysis as informal institutions and is therefore a strong point in providing better analysis. Finally the policy prescriptions of these two approaches are summarized.
Keywords: Culture, Neoclassical School, New Institution School, Informal Institutions, Economic evolution, Economic Development, Douglas North
Full-Text [PDF 512 kb]   (1345 Downloads)    
Article type: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2020/03/25 | Accepted: 2020/10/20 | Published: 2020/11/22
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kheiridoost Langaroodi Z, Momeni F, KhademAlizadeh A. The Effect of Informal Institutions on Economic Development. mieaoi 2020; 9 (32) :53-77
URL: http://mieaoi.ir/article-1-938-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 32 (11-2020) Back to browse issues page
نشریه اقتصاد و بانکداری اسلامی Islamic Economics and Banking
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645