[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: About :: Main :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 49 (12-2024) ::
mieaoi 2024, 13(49): 337-359 Back to browse issues page
Jurisprudential and executive challenges of the civil partnership contract in Iran's banking system and its solution
Mohammad Zarei1 , Mahdi Roayaei2
1- phd, Imam Sadegh University
2- PhD student in Islamic Economics, Research Institute of Hawzeh and University of Research Institute of Hawzeh and University , mahdiroayaei@gmail.com
Abstract:   (827 Views)
Efforts were made to design and implement usury-free banking in Iran through the law of usury-free banking operations. One of the ways to deal with usury in this law is the design of partnership contracts, which include civil partnership, legal partnership, mudarabah, mazarah and masakat. Each of these contracts has certain legal challenges that need to be taken into consideration. The main purpose of this research is to examine the jurisprudence of the civil partnership contract and analyze its jurisprudential challenges with the ijtihad method. Also, some of the most important implementation challenges in the country's banking system have also been examined. The results of the research indicate that the most important and basic jurisprudential challenge of this contract is to change the jurisprudential nature of the company contract from a partnership contract to an exchange contract. In the criticism of the provisions of the contract, 13 jurisprudential problems have been raised, the most important of which are problems such as the customer's voluntary management of the company's property, the obligation to compensate for damages, the obligation to purchase the company by the customer, the responsibility to compensate for the loss caused by legal action, and mortgage before proof of debt. , guaranteeing the trustee and committing to pay possible expenses. The most important implementation challenges are the risk of bad choice, regulatory problems, calendar and valuation of non-cash capital and changing economic conditions and market risk. In this regard, in order to solve the mentioned problems and make optimal use of the capacity of the partnership contract, it was suggested that in addition to reforming the channels of money entering the bank through amending contracts and training and justifying employees, managers and people, the channels of money entering the banking system should also be separated. This will increase the expertise of banks in certain areas and increase the quality of their work.
Article number: 14
Keywords: Company contract, civil partnership, usury-free banking, jurisprudential challenges, executive challenges
Full-Text [PDF 327 kb]   (275 Downloads)    
Article type: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/03/6 | Accepted: 2024/05/10 | Published: 2024/12/30
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

zarei M, roayaei M. Jurisprudential and executive challenges of the civil partnership contract in Iran's banking system and its solution. mieaoi 2024; 13 (49) : 14
URL: http://mieaoi.ir/article-1-1529-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 49 (12-2024) Back to browse issues page
نشریه اقتصاد و بانکداری اسلامی Islamic Economics and Banking
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4713